The relevance of the data collected centers greatly on the context of the research being covered in this case the rising rates of imprisonment and their effects on the non-imprisoned family members. The type of environment chosen for the current study is relied upon to provide some elements of truth.
A good qualitative researcher places emphasis on the context of the research by having excellent communication skills with the respondent to get in-depth knowledge of the subject matter. Researcher plays a vital role in data collection process to present useful and unbiased data. Creating a good relation with the respondent will reinforce the ability to get a thorough analysis of the research.
It provides a systematic description of both the qualitative and quantitative statistical measures to describe the state of affairs of the current study. It provides a dynamic framework to implement principles and relevant learning materials that will help contribute to the project success.
The researcher creates flexibility platform during the interaction session with the participant to allow them to capture a complete sequence of the events. The researcher provides guidelines, moderations, and strategies to pursue during the session.
A multidimensional approach is recommended to derive meaning from the various dependent variables such as the relationship between the researcher and respondents with no bias from either party.
The primary role of the scientist is to explain the role and objectives of the study to the participants. The researcher needs to explain the relevant aspects of his personalities including the expectations, experiences, and assumptions to be carried out during the research. The research plays a vital role in data collection and analysis to present relevant facts to the participants and respondents.
Interviews refer to the data collection method, which involves interaction between two or more persons to exchange ideas and derives information. The interview is an effective methodology to share information, emotion and feelings in a complex text. It provides a favorable immediate response compared to other methods. Besides, it provides easy adaptability and flexibility between the respondent and the researcher to obtain comprehensive information in the area of study.
The study entails an interview conducted by a family member of an inmate who was serving a thirty years sentence for attempted murder. The study aims at assessing the experiences, emotions and the effects of losing a family member to prison. The respondent was an inmate’s wife who significantly contributed to our practical understanding of prisons and their effects on the non-imprisoned family members. Since 1970, the US has witnessed a significant increase in the rates of imprisonment. The effects of incarceration are not limited to those serving their terms behind bars. Respondent’s participation in the survey was voluntary.
The interview raised significant concerns. The wife explained that incarceration places marital status in jeopardy due to the long period of separation. Second, the financial hardship as the father of two was the family’s primary source of income. Third, blames among family members and social stigma. She explained that these challenges compelled her to move to a remote state and keep the matter in secrecy, which again raised the issue of isolation and limited support. Unlike other single parents that are social handled with sympathy and support the non-imprisoned and single parents are treated as guilty by association and hardly is any support directed to them. Fourth, she explained several occasions that she had to deal with a disapproving and hostile society, which raised the issue of grief and loss for the entire family. Fifth, she disclosed the general emotional effects of incarceration in the family, the significant psychological consequences she revealed were sadness, guilt, anxiety, anger, and loneliness. Lastly, she explained a few selected visits in the detention centers and the awful experiences that his husband had to face behind bars.
The survey raised several questions in the criminal and justice department and the capacity of the eight amendments. First, most correctional facilities are geographically isolated which reduces the number of visits by family members.Family relationships have also been thwarted by abnormal checking and monitoring of household conversations during visits.Extreme superficial conversation prevents personal and painful topics, which further prevents adequate consultations.Additionally, the economic disadvantages are cut short by the expensive phone calls. Children of the incinerated persons are the most affected in the family, they experience terrible emotional effects and are likely to be involved in criminal activities. Studies reveal that the criminal and justice departments neglect the setbacks that relatives of the incarcerated persons are likely to experience.
The aspect of rights of inmates is also essential in this study. She explains that her husband has to deal with awful experiences in the correctional center. Detainees should be informed of their rights, as provided in the Eighth Amendment, for instance, punishments should not be cruel and unusual, and prisoners should be free from sexual transgression and harassment. Moreover, rights such as adequate medical care and free from racial discrimination should also be guaranteed (Dunham, 1986).
Incarceration as posed challenges to the affected families, children are the most affected. The extent to which children are affected mainly depends on the age of separation, the level of disruption, the overall connection of the family, availability of primary care providers and support networks. Another factor such as the nature of the crime, the degree of stigma and the length of the sentence also play a significant role to the well-being of the non-imprisoned family members. The available provisions of the Eight Amendment should be honored to protect detainees, the criminal and justice departments should establish policies and programs to protect the non-imprisoned family members (Quigley, 1998).
Dunham, D. (1986). Inmates' Rights and the Privatization of Prisons Columbia Law Review, 86(7) 1475. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1122718
Quigley, J. (1998).Human Rights Defenses in US Courts Human Rights Quarterly, 20(3), 555-591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hrq.1998.0031
The Bill of Rights in modern America: after 200 years (1993). Choice Reviews Online, 30(10), 30-5847-30-5847. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/choice.30-5847
Empirical Studies Assignment Help,business finance assignment help, online business assignment help,business assignment help,business assignment writing service uk,it assignment help,online assignment services,Empirical Studies assignment help services