+91-9519066910
  • My Account
  • solution

    Case Study

    TEAM PROCESS DESIGN CASE STUDY ASSIGNMENT HELP

    Rating:
    TEAM PROCESS DESIGN CASE STUDY ASSIGNMENT HELP


    TEAM PROCESS DESIGN CASE STUDY

    Introduction

    This project will highlight the changes, which reflect in the total check-up process of Ballarat Dentistry. This project will highlight the typical condition of a dentistry, which follows several models & processes in order to make everything under control. The whole process involves some methods for which a patient's checkup time is reduced to a shorter of operations throughout. Upon consideration of these types of repositories, it assists in retrieving those types of problems, which are much closer to the given fragment & to the given model (Rosa et al. 2017). This paper will highlight on the three metrics of the process repositories, which are similar for the model adopted by the Ballarat Dentistry. The repositories include the following:

    The comparison of the attributes & the labels which are linked to the model elements process with the similarity of node matching

    The comparison of the label elements with the process models of topology for the similar structure of the model.

    The comparison of the element labels for capturing the causal relations, which are much similar to the behavior. 

    2.6 7PGM discussion for 7PMG Mendling process

    According to Mendling et al. (2010), 7PMG refers to the recommendations of creating a process model from the very base & enhances in improving the same. Therefore, it ensures to create that process which improves the previous models too. These guidelines, however, make a research, which is totally based on this model (Braun et al. 2015). This also set some guidelines based on which the research is built. The 7PMG also makes that insight where there is are various ways to demonstrate the usual same behavior that had already been used in the process model. These models are also similar to the dissimulation, which is already researched from the perspective of verifying the same (Fan et al. 2016). The 7PMG model also clarifies the most important properties, which are used in changing the processes of the model with the help of the following guidelines:

    G1: It includes the usage of a very few models. The model size also has an undesirable effect, which is based on error underst&ability & likelihood too (Zhu et al. 2016). However, these huge models have a critical effect & hard to underst& too which has a high risk of errors too. 

    G2: It helps in minimising the whole route for every element. The more the degree of total elements, hence, the total number of the outputs & inputs taken together helps in the further underst&ing of the model (Berg et al. 2014). As a result, it becomes quite difficult in underst&ing the same model too. However, there is always a good bonding in between the maximum or average degree of the elements & the errors of modeling too.

    G3: It further states the usage of only one start & one end of any event. As seen in the above figure, the models depicted over there also shows the usage of only one tab for starting as well as ending an event (Helbig et al. 2016). Moreover, the total number of the end & start events are always positive too. 

    G4: Is suggests making the model a good structure. As seen in the above two diagrams all the two models are beautifully structured as & all are aligned with one another too. It is structured in such a way that all the split connectors of the model are connected to the respective joints or corners of the model (Kawamoto & de Almeida, 2017). However, the unstructured models are mostly liked to be seen with several errors. It is created in such a way that any person can be easily able to underst& the same without any problem.

    2.7 7PGM discussion for 7PMG Mending process of Routing

    G5: There is a clear avoidance of routing the elements in the model. The models which have the XOR & the & connectors are free from errors too. However, if there consists of more critical connections, then there is a chance of getting the errors in a similar way.

    G6: It also supports the usage of the activity labels in a wide range. As there is a wide range of explorations, which are generally used, in the proper process of the models, thus it actually discloses all the previous existences of the two major popular processes (Chen & Wang, 2018). From this, the conclusion can be easily drawn that the people can easily consider the object style as “Inform Complaint” which is as more vital in using the labels of the action-noun too.

    G7: It highly reflects the decomposition of the models if it contains less than total number of fifty elements. This frames a guideline, which is highly linked with the G1, which is highly insisted, by the high linking of the errors & size (Fox-Lent et al. 2015). Considering the models, which are having more than fifty elements there, contains a high probability of error. Thus, as a result, all the higher models are split up into further sub-models too. 

                                            case study test, japan 2011 tsunami case study, kf case study,haiti case study, abbotts hall farm case study, case study of flood,case study presentation,change management case study,case study theory test,holderness coastline case study,

                                       Figure  7PMG Model

                                  (Source: Created by Author)

    2.8 Cycle time for Repository node matching process

    Cycle time is the total time required for the completion of a process, where a patient gets in the dentistry for the checkup. The time counts from then only until the completion of the whole process until the patient checks out.

    Considering the whole process as the total number of patients to be 10 in that Ballarat Dentistry, & the number of doctors to be 100, & the total number of nurses to be 100 & there will be more than 1 ambulance. Assuming these values to be a fiction value, the whole cycle time would be 25 min for each patient. A good model always ensures less amount of time to be required for this scenario.

    2.9 Cycle time for Topology Process

    Considering the whole process as the total number of patients to be 25 in that Ballarat Dentistry, & the number of doctors to be 50, & the total number of nurses to be 10 & there will be more than 1 ambulance. Assuming these values to be a fiction value, the whole cycle time would be 35 min for each patient. As this process is much more complex than the previous one, still it did not take that much time for completing the whole cycle. Though it seemed that it is complex, still it went in a good way, as the whole model was much systematic.

    2.10 Redesign for Repository node matching process

    According to Reijers & Mansar (2005), the design of the Business Process is created in such a way that it helps in boosting the business in order to improve the satisfaction of the customers. Upon using heuristics model, it is concluded that all the Product Elements, Project Environment, Criteria for Quality, Techniques of testing & the Oracles are all linked with this model (Cortes et al. 2017). However, as a result, about the completion of this process, there is a flaw also pertaining to this model, which states that the project environment was not met as seen in the diagram, there are some external services too. This affects the project environment. Rethink model of process design shows that Empathies, define, prototype, test, & ideate are followed by the five parameters for determining the process efficiency.

    2.11 Redesign for Topology Process

    Heuristic measures had created a deep impact on the Devil’s Quadrangle with the effect of the cost, time, flexibility & the quality. As compared to the diagram of the Topology Process, there is a slight delay of cycle time. Thus, there comes in issue a flaw pertaining to the time. Due to the huge number of the network procedures in this model, the times are increased.

    2.12 BPMS architecture

                                             case study test, japan 2011 tsunami case study, kf case study,haiti case study, abbotts hall farm case study, case study of flood,case study presentation,change management case study,case study theory test,holderness coastline case study,

                                         Figure  BPMS architecture

                                              (Source: Hertis & Juric, 2014)

    In order to open the designed BPMS architecture follow the below link.

     

    case study test, japan 2011 tsunami case study, kf case study,haiti case study, abbotts hall farm case study, case study of flood,case study presentation,change management case study,case study theory test,holderness coastline case study,

    Conclusion

    The two robust processes include Repository node matching process & Topology Process, which had made things pretty easier. The effectiveness of these models had also reflected in calculating the cycle time for each process. However, this project had also highlighted two flaws, one for each while implementing in their business model. In order to compete with the present market, the business of dentistry needs to incorporate some sort of innovations pertaining to their business. These innovations may include in reducing the overall checkup time for the patients, enhancement of the procedures of checkup & several others.

    case study test, japan 2011 tsunami case study, kf case study,haiti case study, abbotts hall farm case study, case study of flood,case study presentation,change management case study,case study theory test,holderness coastline case study,